Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 2018:groups:g1:start [2018/01/11 08:52] – [Assignment] mendes
+++ 2018:groups:g1:start [2024/01/09 18:45] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
   * Lawrence, S. E. "Sexual cannibalism in the praying mantid, Mantis religiosa: a field study." Animal Behaviour 43.4 (1992): 569-583.[[http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347205810176]]
   * Barry, Katherine L., Gregory I. Holwell, and Marie E. Herberstein. "Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity." Behavioral Ecology 19.4 (2008): 710-715.[[https://academic.oup.com/beheco/article/19/4/710/201821]]
+===== 15/01/18 =====
+Initial Brainstorm:
+  * We need to model the strategies of the population
+  * Graph on the temporal evolution of frequencies
+  * If cannibalistic can invade non-cannibalistic, and vice-versa, than both strategies can exist
+  * Two different strategies can coexist, and in this kind of systems they were reported to coexist, but there is no apparent reason why would this happen in this situation
+  * What determines if a strategy can invade the other is just the beginning of the strategy
+  * [Rebouças] We probably need 3 DOEs (male, female-1, female-2 or male-1, male-2, female). And a model for each kind of question (2 models)
+  * [Pollo] Fitness can be situation-dependent
+  * [Rebouças] Fitness doesn't need to be explicit in the model, but can be derived from it